Understanding What Reduces Academic Misconduct Intention Among College Students in the AI Era

Nguyen Phong Luan Phan1,  
1 Faculty of Economics, HCMC University of Technology and Engineering, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new challenges for academic integrity in higher education. Although previous studies have primarily examined academic misconduct among university students, less attention has been paid to college students and the factors that may mitigate their intentions to engage in such misconduct. Accordingly, this study examines the relationships between four factors and college students’ intentions to violate academic integrity in the context of AI use. A survey was conducted with 358 college students in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The data were analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Pearson’s correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression. The results indicate that perceived risk, perceived behavioral control, and attitudes toward academic misconduct are significantly and negatively associated with misconduct intentions, whereas subjective norms are not statistically significant. Perceived risk exhibits the strongest negative association with misconduct intentions (β = −0.514). This study contributes empirical evidence from a college student population and extends the application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) by incorporating perceived risk alongside its original components. The findings suggest that educational institutions should establish clearer academic integrity policies, communicate the consequences of misconduct, and provide students with practical guidance on the acceptable use of AI.

Article Details

References

Acosta‑Enriquez, B. G., Ballesteros, M. A. A., Jordan, O. H., Roca, C. L., & Tirado, K. S. (2024). Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12, 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ariani, M., Sriyunianti, F., & Fontanella, A. (2020). Determinants of students academic dishonesty. Proceedings of The 1st International Conference on Applied Social Sciences, Business, and Humanity. Padang State Polytechnic. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-11-2019.2294014
Baig, M., & Paparo, J. (2026). A preliminary investigation of intentions to engage in academic misconduct using generative artificial intelligence tools. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2026.2663440
Bui, T. T., & Nguyen, M. T. (2024). Research the impact of artificial intelligence in education on student learning activities. Vietnam Journal Of Education, 24(10), 6-11.
Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Grabowski, D., Mello, A. L., Kuntz, J., Zaharia, D. V., Hapon, N., Lupina-Wegener, A., & Börü, D. (2015). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Academic Cheating Research–Cross-Cultural Comparison. Ethics & Behavior, 26(8), 638-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1112745
Dang, H. D., & Bui, T. N. (2025). AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education. Journal of Science Hanoi Open University, (6A), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.662
Dang, H. V., & Nguyen, T. L. (2021). An Evaluation of Student’s Academic Intergrity by Their Perception on Academic Environment and Dishonesty Behaviours. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 16(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.16.1.1389.2021
Elom, C. O., Ayanwale, M. A., Ukeje, I. O., Offiah, G. A., Umoke, C. C., & Ogbonnaya, C. E. (2025). Does AI Knowledge Encourage Cheating? Investigating Student Perceptions, Ethical Engagement, and Academic Integrity in the Digital Age. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(4), 708-729. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.4.33
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hoang, T. T. H., Dang, K. L., Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, N. L., To, T. H., & Pham, X. T. (2024). Factors affecting the “Academic Integrity” of university students in the context of artificial intelligence development. Vietnam Journal Of Education, 24(10), 47-52.
Hoang, T. T. H., Le, P. H., Nguyen, L. K., Dao, T. M. L., & Nguyen, T. N. (2023). Factors affecting students' "Academic Integrity" in the context of digital transformation at universities. Vietnam Journal Of Education, 23(12), 29-33.
Hua, J. H. (2023). Beyond exams: Investigating AI tool impact on student attitudes, ethical awareness, and academic dishonesty in online college assessments. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 4(4), 160-185. https://doi.org/10.53378/353030
Kamarudin, N. A., Sopian, A., Hamzah, F., & Sharifudin, M. A. S. (2024). Motivational perspectives on student cheating behaviour: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(3), 1117-1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i3/21137
Lund, B. D., Lee, T. H., Mannuru, N. R., & Arutla, N. (2025). AI and academic integrity: Exploring student perceptions and implications for higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1545-1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09613-3
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: a review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Nguyen, A. H. (2025). The impact of academic pressure on AI use behavior and the risk of academic integrity violations: An empirical analysis from a student survey at Hanoi Open University. Journal of Science Hanoi Open University, 6A, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.670
Nguyen, H. M., & Do, T. K. H. (2025). Factors affecting academic integrity of students at Hanoi Open University in the context of digital transformation. Journal of Science Hanoi Open University, 6A, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.668
Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Rahmatika, D. N., & Wijaya, J. R. T., Saha, S., Prihatin, Y., & Zuhry, N. (2025). Reframing academic dishonesty in the digital era: The interplay of ethics, learning habits, and perceived detection risk. International Journal of Leadership and Management, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.65176/IJLM.V2I2.02
Salamah, I., & Kusumanto, R. (2022). Factors influencing academic dishonesty among Sriwijaya State Polytechnic students. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 3(2), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v3i2.491
Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Assessing health students' attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation study. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e48254. https://doi.org/10.2196/48254
Shmeleva, E., & Semenova, T. (2019). Academic dishonesty among college students: Academic motivation vs. contextual factors. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 3, 101-129. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-3-101-129