Managing Primary School Teachers’ Professional Competence Development in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Current Status and Implications for School Leadership

Thanh Hung Cao1,   , Van Thong Ho2,
1 PhD candidate at Dong Thap University, Vietnam
2 Dong Thap University, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

Vietnam’s 2018 General Education Curriculum places growing demands on primary school teachers’ professional competence and on school leaders’ capacity to manage continuing professional development. Despite growing attention to teacher professional learning in Vietnam, limited research has examined professional competence development as an integrated management cycle, particularly in primary schools in the Mekong Delta. This study examined the perceived extent of implementation of four management functions - planning, organizing, directing, and monitoring and evaluating - and compared perceptions between teachers and school administrators. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, using descriptive statistics and independent-samples t-tests. The sample consisted of 750 respondents from 20 primary schools across 13 Mekong Delta provinces and cities, including 550 teachers and 200 administrators. Data were collected using a 20-item, four-point Likert questionnaire covering planning, organizing, directing, and monitoring and evaluation. Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .81 to .85. Planning and monitoring/evaluation were perceived as having been more extensively implemented than organizing and directing. No significant differences between teachers and administrators emerged across the four overall dimensions. However, administrators rated information technology (IT) and foreign-language training significantly higher than teachers did (p < .001). Consequently, schools should strengthen needs-based planning, school-based professional learning, stakeholder coordination, supportive leadership, and the developmental use of evaluation evidence.

Article Details

References

Atwal, K. (2013). Theories of workplace learning in relation to teacher professional learning in UK primary schools. Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.85w1x
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/the-standards/teacher-standards
Bertschy, F., Künzli, C., & Lehmann, M. (2013). Teachers’ competencies for the implementation of educational offers in the field of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 5(12), 5067-5080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5125067
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Brockmann, M., Clarke, L., Méhaut, P., & Winch, C. (2008). Competence-based vocational education and training (VET): The cases of England and France in a European perspective. Vocations and Learning, 1(3), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-008-9013-2
Caena, F. (2011). Literature review: Teachers’ core competences: Requirements and development: European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture.
Cong-Lem, N. (2021). Teacher agency: A systematic review of the international literature. Issues in Educational Research, 31(3), 718-738.
Dang, V. H. N. (2018). The government’s policy on EFL teacher professional development: Opportunities and challenges for the Mekong Delta. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(8), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2018.037
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
Day, C., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Open University Press.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Earley, P., & Bubb, S. (2004). Leading and managing continuing professional development: Developing people, developing schools. SAGE.
Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00392.x
Evans, L. (2014). Leadership for professional development and learning: Enhancing our understanding of how teachers develop. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.860083
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Ho, L. H. (2024). Implementing education reforms: A multiple case study of Vietnamese primary schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow]. Enlighten Theses. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/84275/
Ho, V. T., Tran, V. D., Nguyen, V. D., Phan, T. N., & Cao, T. H. (2023). The process of developing professional capacity for teachers. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 10(3), 489-501. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4892
Kuijpers, J. M., Houtveen, A. A. M., & Wubbels, T. (2010). An integrated professional development model for effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1687-1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.021
Lambirth, A., Cabral, A., McDonald, R., Philpott, C., Brett, A., & Magaji, A. (2021). Teacher-led professional development through a model of action research, collaboration, and facilitation. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 815-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685565
Lopes, A., Folque, A., Marta, M., & de Sousa, R. T. (2024). Teacher professionalism towards transformative education: Insights from a literature review. Professional Development in Education, 50(5), 832-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2235572
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385.
McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. M. (2019). A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452782
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). Circular No. 20/2018/TT-BGDĐT promulgating professional standards for teachers at general education institutions [Thông tư số 20/2018/TT-BGDĐT ban hành quy định chuẩn nghề nghiệp giáo viên cơ sở giáo dục phổ thông].
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018a). General education program: Master program (Issued together with Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT dated December 26, 2018).
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018b). Professional standards for teachers of general education institutions (Issued together with Circular No. 20/2018/TT-BGDĐT).
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nawab, A., Bissaker, K., & Datoo, A. K. (2021). Contemporary trends in the professional development of teachers: The importance of recognizing context. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1176-1190. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2020-0476
Nguyen, H. T., Hallinger, P., & Chen, C. W. (2018). Assessing and strengthening instructional leadership among primary school principals in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(3), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2017-0046
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725
Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., & Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109-130.
Tallerico, M. (2005). Supporting and sustaining teachers’ professional development: A principal’s guide. Corwin Press.
Whitworth, B. A., & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9411-2
Wilcox, K. C., & Lawson, H. A. (2018). Teachers’ agency, efficacy, engagement, and emotional resilience during policy innovation implementation. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9313-0